Attitudes and Issues

I have a great purpose in mind for setting up this blog. That purpose is to make a difference. That being said, though I invite you openly to read and see my thoughts and visions on a variety of topics, I strongly feel that there has been more than enough ranting and raging. I invite any positive feedback you may wish to share. I encourage you to take any ideas you may find here and use them in your own unique way to improve some corner of your society. If you wish to criticise or diminish, however, please go to your own site for that. Thank you.

• The Abandonment Issue:

It is my opinion that abandonment occurs when needs are not met. Whether those needs are physical, emotional, or spiritual they are part of the unique quality of humanity. To deny or diminish one or more of those needs is to diminish the being... enough beings diminished reduces a society... enough societies diminished reduces humanity's role as guardians of the planet and its creatures.

• The Fallacy of Time:

1. If the concept of Eternity being all time, without beginning and without end, is taken as a "given" and represented by a circle.
2. If a linear plane is drawn to intersect the circle at only 1 point.
3. If any point on that line going left from the single point is given a (-) negative value, and any point going to the right is given a (+) positive value, these represent the past and the future.
4. Since linear time never before and never again intersects the circle of eternity, past and future become fictitious.
5. The fulcrum is "the point" of time in eternity. That point is NOW, and the only point which exists in the physical world of reality as we know it.

Since now is the only time that exists, the only thing that makes a difference in life is how one chooses to use it, whether it be to do something of service or disservice to humanity.

• The Fallacy of Money:

Using the same basic model,

1. If the circle of Eternity (above) is now used to represent all the money there is.
2. If the intersecting line touches the circle at only one point (let's call it $1 one dollar).
3. If any point ($1 value) to the left (-) is a credit (withdrawal or charge), and any point to the right (+) is a debit (deposit or investment).
4. Since the line of money never again touches the circle of all there is, then the only point is that $1 and all credits and debits are merely marks on a scorecard... they don't really exist.
5. Since money doesn't really exist, the only thing that makes a difference is what one decides, right now, to do with the $1 he/she has.

Therefore: Will I choose to do something with my $1 which serves humanity or will I waste it on some trivial thing which, in a few moments from now, will cease to provide for or amuse myself?

And Last, (My personal Favorite Theory):

• The Fallacy of Religion:

For this model I chose the symbol of an Equilateral-Triangle Within a Circle.

1. Let the circle represent One Almighty Being, the one who is often said to be the singular creator of all the universes inclusive of the one in which we live as small samples of His Creativity.
2. Let the very top point of the equilateral-triangle represent Me (I), as in "I am one", and "All that I am".
3. Let the point to the left of the triangle represent You (II), as in "aye-aye" (for your approving vote), or (II) as in the Roman numeral for 2.
4. Let the point to the right represent Us (III), as in the Roman numeral for 3, as in "We the People", Society at large, or all of Mankind.
5. Let all the points along the lines of this triangle on all three of its sides represent All of the Religions and Philosophies for life that there are in known (or unknown) existence.
6. Finally, Let the linear line of my life and my own spirit's life (previous- existence, present-existence and post-existence inclusive) be represented by a horizontal line across the top of this equilateral triangle within a circle. This horizontal line now rests on the fulcrum point of me. It rests balanced like the scales of justice based on the concept of one almighty God, the singular champion of all things Just and True.

• Let anything I do or say, which goes to the left (-) and negatively affects you (II), and which in turn negatively affects (III) we, the society in which I live, be considered "bad, wrong, or evil".
• Let anything I do or say, which goes to the right (+) and positively affects we (III), the society in which I live, and which in turn positively affects (II) you, the freedoms and rights you enjoy, be considered "good, right, and true".

Now, let us sit with that thought for a moment and think. If my religion says, "There is but One Universal God, the creator of all mankind in His (or Her) image." And, if your religion is different than mine, but says that, "There is but One Universal God, the creator of all mankind in His (or Her) image." Please enlighten me as to why do we fight over this?